Curation is not personal taste. It starts from criteria, context, and responsibility. Those who curate do not choose “what they like.” They select what makes sense for a program, for an audience, and for a particular historical and cultural moment. This requires vision, coherence, and an informed reading of the artistic field; its dynamics, tensions, and absences. Curation demands critical distance: one must discern between individual preference and artistic, social, or conceptual relevance.
Taste may serve as a starting point, never as a final argument. Curation works with diversity of languages, contrasts, frictions, and questions that unsettle or open new perspectives. It seeks works that speak to one another, that build meaning together, and that broaden cultural debate. A curatorial program is not measured by its alignment with the curator’s personal universe, but by its capacity to generate reflection, critical reading, and meaningful experience for different audiences.
To be a curator is to make informed decisions: to study, compare, contextualize, justify. It means knowing the artists, the processes, the territories of practice, the political and symbolic implications of choices. It means constructing a narrative, not assembling a list of preferences. It presupposes ethical responsibility in representation, in inclusion, in attention to inequalities of visibility and access.
When curation is confused with personal taste, rigor, diversity, and cultural relevance are lost. The artistic ecosystem is reduced to an individual mirror, and collective dialogue is impoverished. Curation is critical, intellectual, and relational work. It is not whim, nor an exercise in vanity, but a commitment to thought and to the artistic community.
Photo: © redcharlie | Unsplash
Leave a Reply